The Global Forum carries on peer reviews to assess the standard of exchange of information on request (EOIR) and rates the jurisdictions’ compliance. Four ratings can be allocated to a jurisdiction once it has undergone a full peer review:
Compliant: The EOIR standard is implemented. This rating can be granted even if a few recommendations were issued, to the extent that no material deficiencies were identified.
Largely Compliant: The EOIR standard is implemented to a large extent but improvements are needed. Some deficiencies identified are material but have limited impact on EOIR.
Partially Compliant: The EOIR standard is only partly implemented. At least one material deficiency which has had, or is likely to have, a significant effect on EOIR in practice has been identified.
Non-Compliant: Fundamental deficiencies in the implementation of the EOIR standard have been identified.
The implementation of the international standards on transparency and exchange of information has been swift and global. Only few jurisdictions have fallen short in meeting the commitments made to the Global Forum. They are provided with support to advance their regulatory environment and practices.
As of 6 April 2020, 113 jurisdictions are currently rated as “Compliant” (24), “Largely Compliant” (85) or “Provisionally Largely Compliant” (2) on their overall performance in the effective implementation of the EOIR Standard, which powerfully signals generally high compliance with the standard. Only 13 jurisdictions have been rated as “Partially Compliant” (11) or “Non-Compliant” (2).
The Global Forum completed its first round of peer reviews in 2016, and subsequently established a Fast-Track review procedure, which was a one-time process to allow jurisdictions to quickly demonstrate any progress made in implementing the EOIR standard (find out more).
» Detailed first round ratings are available via our interactive tool
» Schedule of reviews for the period 2016-2023 covering all Global Forum members as well as relevant non-members